Le Lun 5 mai 2008 21:35, Hans de Goede a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> Le Lun 5 mai 2008 18:40, Tom Lane a écrit : >> >>> Given a single SRPM generating multiple sub-RPMs, some of which >>> depend >>> on each other, how hard should the maintainer try to ensure that >>> matching versions of the sub-RPMs are installed? >> >> If you fear that mismatched subpackages may not work well together, >> I'd have them all conflict with versions < exact same build. What >> you're trying to describe is a conflict. Any sane repository will >> always have subpackages at the same build level, and not >> self-conflict >> (that's the main reason we ask people to avoid conflicts today; it >> wouldn't apply in your case). >> > > Ugh, no no no, thats just ugly for no good reason, just add a Requires > to the > full version of the base package, or the sub-package that the > sub-package needs. That only works if you have a nice subpackage hierarchy. Not all packages are like that -- Nicolas Mailhot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
