On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 21:43 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > I don't recall that. It was discussed that we'd like to deviate as > little as possible from JPackage conventions and work with them to get > critical changes we need accepted there. Ok, I've made a bad assumption. What is preventing the Fedora guidelines from becoming the jpackage guidelines? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging