-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yes that makes sense, I suppose what I will do then is look for 'moc-qt4' first, then just 'moc'. However, it would probably be advantageous for Fedora to include a symlink between moc and moc-qt4, perhaps with some mechanism to switch between that and moc-qt3. Anyway, thanks for your help. Chris. Rex Dieter wrote: | Chris Spencer wrote: | | |> I think the easiest thing to do would probably be to just add another |> check for 'moc-qt4' and fail if it doesn't find either. I guess what I'm |> really asking is why it was done like this? Developers expect it to be |> under the name 'moc', renaming it without even a symlink is just going |> to create problems. | | Both qt3 and qt4 provide "moc" (there are other dups, but let's still with | this example). So, a convention that most distros use is to ship moc-qt3 | and moc-qt4 (and possibly a 'moc' pointing to one of those). | | -- Rex | | -- | Fedora-packaging mailing list | Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx | https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhjo9IACgkQ6iqRtkAADZjFKgCgiw2mX+gGojlO9K2uvvI2S9dR cDsAn17XlpIKfYl6jzdNMIEL4iZcITIV =Oh1M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
