On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 08:55 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > One use case that comes to mind: someone doing a spin that can't meet the > Fedora criteria for still being called Fedora. In theory, simply replacing > fedora-release and fedora-logos is sufficient, but in practice, Fedora (and/or > Red Hat) shows up a few other places as well. In gnome, System->About Fedora > still shows up, and System->About Fedora still says "Distributor: Red Hat, > Inc." (this one probably ought to say "Fedora Project" for Fedora...). In web > pages, the apache identifier string is still "Apache/2.2.8 (Fedora)", and I'm > sure there are probably other cases as well. Well, there is a difference in saying that we got these packages from Fedora, and "We are Fedora", and this could wind up being a lengthy discussion with the RH legal team. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
