Re: Java packaging guidelines draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Andrew Overholt wrote:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Java

All of the questions and comments and TODOs that were on the page have
been taken care of.  I'm sure there are going to be questions and
complaints, but we now feel it's in a state worthy of first draft
presentation.

I'd like to draw some attention to my question about why to install the versioned jars. Nicolas is trying to help me understand, but I'm either correct in that they should just be dropped or too dumb so far to get it (in which case I think it needs a real explanation in the guidelines):

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-March/msg02346.html

Yes, I've struggled to understand the same decision in the JDK packages. I wonder why the extra level of versioning is required:

$ ls -l /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 2007-12-11 14:36 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea -> java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0

Nicolas, do you know the rationale? To enable parallel-installation of multiple versions of the same JDK, perhaps?

Tom

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux