Jason L Tibbitts III (tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > I guess I'm really having trouble coming to grips with multilib, > because I see that the ocaml modules are not multilib while the -devel > packages are. In fact, the only ocaml i386 packages I see in current > rawhide x86_64 are -devel packages of modules. Is something broken > with the rawhide repo generation, am I just confused as to how you > could ever install those -devel modules without matching arch versions > of the non-devel packages, or are we perhaps seeing the problem under > discussion in action? Packages are pulled in as multilib either from being named -devel, or bevcause they package something obviously determinable as a 'library'. I suspect the modules don't appear to be libraries. Bill -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
