On Saturday 31 May 2008, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 06:56:33PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > Reencoding the xml files that specify an encoding isn't strictly > > necessary. We should probably ask upstream whether they are amenable to > > I think that reencoding files that carry over the encoding information > (info, texinfo, tex and xml for example) is wrong. It is better to let > upstream do whatever they want. I agree with Toshio on this one, IMO it's not necessarily wrong. Anyway wrt. XML files, upstreams probably wouldn't mind a friendly reminder that the only encodings conformant XML processors are required to support are UTF-8 and UTF-16. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
