On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 17:24 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > I still believe it would be ok to continue with reviewing java > packages on a > best foot forward notion until the guidelines are finished though. I > believe > that holding packages up for formal reasons like this (other then > legal > formalities) tends to frustrate contributers, and thats the last thing > we want > to do. The flip side of this is if we let packages pass review without any guidelines on which to base the review by, then there is no real motivation for those packagers (or anyone) to generate the guidelines. ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
