Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 05:51:31PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> As promised, here is my new proposed draft for handling static libs:
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLibraryPolicy
> 
> I know that it won't make everyone happy (it doesn't just leave static
> bits in -devel), but we really do want to track who is building against
> static libraries.

Can you remove the perjorative term "deficiency", since OCaml has good
reasons for statically linking to do with software safety.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux