Fedora Packaging
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Repotag in EPEL
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Repotag in EPEL
- Re: Repotag in EPEL
- Re: Repotag in EPEL
- Re: Repotag in EPEL
- Repotag in EPEL
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: How to deal with folders that need the user to change permissions on?
- Re: Re: How to deal with folders that need the user to change permissions on?
- Re: How to deal with folders that need the user to change permissions on?
- How to deal with folders that need the user to change permissions on?
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: cmake rpm macro(s):
- cmake rpm macro(s):
- Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: buildroot race condition
- legal guidelines for new fonts?
- Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: buildroot race condition
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: buildroot race condition
- Re: buildroot race condition
- buildroot race condition
- Re: perl-* build dependencies
- Re: perl-* build dependencies
- Re: perl-* build dependencies
- Re: perl-* build dependencies
- Re: perl-* build dependencies
- perl-* build dependencies
- Re: Re: Temporarily removing a sub-package
- Re: Re: Temporarily removing a sub-package
- Re: Temporarily removing a sub-package
- Packaging of ruby gems
- Re: Temporarily removing a sub-package
- Temporarily removing a sub-package
- Re: Daylight saving time
- Re: Daylight saving time
- Daylight saving time
- %config on folder permissions?
- Desktop files guidelines
- Re: IAXy Firmware
- IAXy Firmware
- Re: License question - fastcgi / openmarket license
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: License question - fastcgi / openmarket license
- License question - fastcgi / openmarket license
- Re: Proposal to disallow %config* under /usr
- Proposal to disallow %config* under /usr
- Re: Two different locale names in one package?
- Re: Reply-To on fedora-package-review list
- Reply-To on fedora-package-review list
- Permissions to edit Review / PackageGuidelines
- Re: Two different locale names in one package?
- Re: Two different locale names in one package?
- Re: Two different locale names in one package?
- Re: Two different locale names in one package?
- Two different locale names in one package?
- Re: Fonts scriptlet for CORE packages
- Re: Re: Firmware packaging, v3
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Configuration files in /usr
- Re: Firmware packaging, v3
- Re: Firmware packaging, v3
- Re: Firmware packaging, v3
- Re: Firmware packaging, v3
- Re: Firmware packaging, v3
- Re: Configuration files in /usr
- Configuration files in /usr
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Firmware packaging, v3
- Re: Tcl packaging guidelines proposal
- Re: Tcl packaging guidelines proposal
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Tcl packaging guidelines proposal
- Re: Stopping the mandatory buildroot insanity
- Re: Tcl packaging guidelines proposal
- Re: FE-Legal review
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Tcl packaging guidelines proposal
- Re: Tcl packaging guidelines proposal
- Re: Tcl packaging guidelines proposal
- Re: Tcl packaging guidelines proposal
- Re: Tcl packaging guidelines proposal
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Requires(post{,un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Re: Executable documentation
- Re: Re: Executable documentation
- Re: Re: Executable documentation
- Re: Re: Executable documentation
- Re: Re: Executable documentation
- Re: Re: Executable documentation
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Executable documentation
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Executable documentation
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- FE-Legal review
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Executable documentation
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Please update PHP PECL Guidelines : [Fwd: [SECURITY] Fedora Core 6 Update: php-5.1.6-3.4.fc6]
- Please update PHP PECL Guidelines : [Fwd: [SECURITY] Fedora Core 6 Update: php-5.1.6-3.4.fc6]
- Executable documentation
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Firmware packaging, v2
- Firmware packaging, v2
- Re: Stopping the mandatory buildroot insanity
- Re: Scripts around rpm (was: Re: Draft: Init Scripts)
- Re: Scripts around rpm (was: Re: Draft: Init Scripts)
- Re: Scripts around rpm (was: Re: Draft: Init Scripts)
- Re: Scripts around rpm
- Re: Scripts around rpm (was: Re: Draft: Init Scripts)
- Re: Scripts around rpm
- Scripts around rpm (was: Re: Draft: Init Scripts)
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Use of vendor in .desktop files
- Re: Use of vendor in .desktop files
- Use of vendor in .desktop files
- Re: Stopping the mandatory buildroot insanity
- Re: Stopping the mandatory buildroot insanity
- Re: Stopping the mandatory buildroot insanity
- Re: Stopping the mandatory buildroot insanity
- Re: Stopping the mandatory buildroot insanity
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Stopping the mandatory buildroot insanity
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- BuildRoot and mktemp -d
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Draft: Init Scripts
- Draft: Init Scripts
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Tcl packaging guidelines proposal
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Source Url Guidelines
- Source Url Guidelines
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: BuildRoot and mktemp -d
- Re: BuildRoot and mktemp -d
- Re: BuildRoot and mktemp -d
- Re: BuildRoot and mktemp -d
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: BuildRoot and mktemp -d
- Re: BuildRoot and mktemp -d
- BuildRoot and mktemp -d
- Re: Firmware packaging
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Firmware packaging
- Re: Firmware packaging
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Firmware packaging
- Re: Firmware packaging
- Re: Firmware packaging
- Re: Firmware packaging
- Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Missing tomorrow's meeting
- Re: Firmware packaging
- Re: Firmware packaging
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Firmware packaging
- Re: Firmware packaging
- Re: Firmware packaging
- Re: Firmware packaging
- Re: Firmware packaging
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Firmware packaging
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Firmware packaging
- Firmware packaging
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Missing tomorrow's meeting
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Wrong buildroot ...
- Re: Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Requires(post{,un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Requires(post{, un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Requires(post{,un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Requires(post{,un}) on something in coreutils
- Requires(post{,un}) on something in coreutils
- Re: Too many exceptions
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Too many exceptions
- Re: Re: Development/Libraries/Java Group?
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Development/Libraries/Java Group?
- [Proposal] Spec file name revision
- Re: plugin naming
- Re: Clarification/ammendment to the "non-numeric characters are permitted in the Version: field" clause
- Re: Clarification/ammendment to the "non-numeric characters are permitted in the Version: field" clause
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Clarification/ammendment to the "non-numeric characters are permitted in the Version: field" clause
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Clarification/ammendment to the "non-numeric characters are permitted in the Version: field" clause
- Re: Re: Re: some comments on the desktop files section and proposed amendmends
- Re: Re: Re: some comments on the desktop files section and proposed amendmends
- Re: Re: Re: some comments on the desktop files section and proposed amendmends
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Re: some comments on the desktop files section and proposed amendmends
- Re: Re: some comments on the desktop files section and proposed amendmends
- Re: Re: some comments on the desktop files section and proposed amendmends
- Re: Re: some comments on the desktop files section and proposed amendmends
- Re: some comments on the desktop files section and proposed amendmends
- Re: some comments on the desktop files section and proposed amendmends
- Re: some comments on the desktop files section and proposed amendmends
- Re: some comments on the desktop files section and proposed amendmends
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- some comments on the desktop files section and proposed amendmends
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
- Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- filing ExclusiveArch bugs when it's HW architectural
- Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Re: Exception for JPackage
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: User IDs in Core packages?
- Re: Re: User IDs in Core packages?
- Re: User IDs in Core packages?
- Re: Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Re: User IDs in Core packages?
- Re: Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: User IDs in Core packages?
- User IDs in Core packages?
- Re: Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: DesktopFiles proposal, final wording
- Re: DesktopFiles proposal, final wording
- Re: DesktopFiles proposal, final wording
- Re: DesktopFiles proposal, final wording
- Re: DesktopFiles proposal, final wording
- Re: DesktopFiles proposal, final wording
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Re: Exception for JPackage
- Exception for JPackage
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- more verbose PackagingGuidelinee on compiler flags
- DesktopFiles proposal, final wording
- plugin naming
- PHP Extensions (other than pear) default install dir
- Re: Unused direct shared library dependencies and rpmlint
- BuildRequires proposal
- Re: Unused direct shared library dependencies and rpmlint
- Unused direct shared library dependencies and rpmlint
- Re: erroneous provides
- Re: erroneous provides
- Re: erroneous provides
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: erroneous provides
- Re: erroneous provides
- Re: erroneous provides
- Re: erroneous provides
- Re: erroneous provides
- erroneous provides
- erroneous provides
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- Re: Upstream sources that contain binaries
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Upstream sources that contain binaries
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Java naming scheme
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: Java naming scheme
- Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Java naming scheme
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- LibtoolArchives, v0.3
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- Re: Missing todays meeting
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- DesktopFiles proposal
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- Conflicts Draft Proposal Round 2
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Missing todays meeting
- Re: Desktop files: "Application" category
- Re: Re: Desktop files: "Application" category
- Re: Desktop files: "Application" category
- Desktop files: "Application" category
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal
- Re: Conflicts Draft Proposal
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- interesting rpm-devel thread wrt libtool/.la file policy
- fonts packaging guidelines, or advices?
- Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Guidelines and epochs
- Guidelines and epochs
- Re: Acceptability of "content" in merged Fedora
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Acceptability of "content" in merged Fedora
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
- Re: Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Packaging/PHP : add channels packaging proposal.
- Re: (Un)packaging partly patented software
- (Un)packaging partly patented software
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Packaging/PHP : some update proposal
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: iconcache, v0.5
- Re: iconcache, v0.5
- iconcache, v0.5
- Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: printing textual messages in %post etc.?
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Re: %posttrans scriptlet
- Re: printing textual messages in %post etc.?
- Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: printing textual messages in %post etc.?
- Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: printing textual messages in %post etc.?
- Re: printing textual messages in %post etc.?
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Proposal to limit file deps
- printing textual messages in %post etc.?
- Proposal to limit file deps
- Re: Re: %posttrans scriptlet
- Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash.
- Packaging/PHP : some update proposal
- Re: Re: icon cache scriplets
- Re: Re: icon cache scriplets, using %posttrans
- Re: Re: %posttrans scriptlet
- Re: Re: %posttrans scriptlet
- Re: Re: %posttrans scriptlet
- Re: icon cache scriplets, using %posttrans
- Re: %posttrans scriptlet
- Re: icon cache scriplet guideline update
- Re: rawhide report: 20061219 changes
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: More Mono confusion
- Re: More Mono confusion
- More Mono confusion
- Re: what policy for python egg files
- Re: Re: what policy for python egg files
- Re: what policy for python egg files
- Re: Re: what policy for python egg files
- Re: what policy for python egg files
- Re: what policy for python egg files
- Re: Re: what policy for python egg files
- Re: Re: what policy for python egg files
- Re: what policy for python egg files
- Re: Re: File deps outside "/etc {/usr,}/{s,}bin/"
- Re: Re: what policy for python egg files
- Re: Re: what policy for python egg files
- Re: what policy for python egg files
- Re: what policy for python egg files
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite Forum]
[KDE Users]