On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:42:17PM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > > Maybe we need a minimal assumed runtime environment just like we > > define a minimal assumed build evironment? > > What's wrong with the current situation that we need such a change? Because as it stands now the OP's question on whether to add coreutils as a dependency is valid and would have to be positively confirmed. Or rephrased: the current situation is that the practice and the guidelines diverge and we need to fix one of them. > > The definition of such a beast would be the minimal set of packages > > that are needed to do anything sensible, for example everything that > > is pulled in by redhat-lsb (which includes coreutils). > > Hahaha... Why not just add KDE and openoffice to the base environment? Because they are too big? Hohoho. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpabJ69OqjbB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
