Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx (Axel Thimm) writes: >> > Maybe we need a minimal assumed runtime environment just like we >> > define a minimal assumed build evironment? >> >> What's wrong with the current situation that we need such a change? > > Because as it stands now the OP's question on whether to add coreutils > as a dependency is valid and would have to be positively confirmed. Or > rephrased: the current situation is that the practice and the > guidelines diverge and we need to fix one of them. Obviously, 'coreutils' MUST be a Requires(...) when they are used in the corresponding scriptlet. Afais, only some Core package are violating this simple rule and must be fixed. >> > The definition of such a beast would be the minimal set of packages >> > that are needed to do anything sensible, for example everything >> > that is pulled in by redhat-lsb (which includes coreutils). >> >> Hahaha... Why not just add KDE and openoffice to the base environment? > > Because they are too big? Hohoho. Is there such big difference in the size between 'redhat-lsb' and 'KDE'? Enrico
Attachment:
pgpf6YvBu3fv3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
