Re: BuildRoot and mktemp -d

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:04:39AM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 February 2007, you wrote:
> >
> > The following page has been changed by TomCallaway:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GuidelinesTodo
> [...]
> > + ||ratify ||New Required Buildroot||[wiki:Self:TomCallaway
> > spot]||2007-02-13||Change required buildroot for new packages to %(mktemp
> > -d %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) (old packages/core
> > merge packages using old buildroot are grandfathered)||
> 
> Using mktemp -d in specfiles' BuildRoot means that quite a few stray temp dirs 
> will start to appear in %{_tmppath}.  For example "rpm -q --specfile 
> foo.spec" and "rpmbuild -bs foo.spec" create them, and nothing cleans them up 
> (no, tmpwatch doesn't count) - we probably don't want that.
> 
> One way to avoid it is mktemp -ud, but it's more racy than plain -d.  I 
> think -ud would be a better choice nevertheless.

Good catch! +1
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpIJF59pu4i3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux