On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 18:40 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 18:17 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > >>>>> "TC" == Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > TC> This exception documents how Java packages which come from > > TC> JPackage are to be handled, and paves the way for the eventual > > TC> removal of the jpp tag. > > > > I have no problem with granting the exception, but I do think the > > definition of the exception should include a explicitly state the > > conditions under which it will go away. > > > > The linked document has rationale and ideas for things to be added to > > rpm and yum under the "Proposal" section, but there's no clear > > statement of just how long the exception is to be granted. (Perhaps > > it's intended to be permanent; it's just not clear from the document.) > > Unfortunately, the exception will be permanent for the Java packages > from JPackage. The exception will be modified when we can safely drop > the jpp tag from Fedora. Err.. If you mean "permanent for the Java packages *in* JPackage" then I'm still okay with the proposal. Otherwise I'm changing my vote.... -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
