Re: erroneous provides

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "MC" == Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

MC> So, how does this list like the idea of adding a bulletpoint for
MC> "sane provides" to the package review guidelines ?

I have always checked these in my reviews; I list out the dependencies
so that others who happen to peruse the reviews can perhaps spot
anything that I miss.  It's caught problems in the past.

Of course, as others have pointed out, it's tough to define "sane".  I
generally know a bogus provide when I see one, but I don't think I
could list out all of the criteria.

 - J<

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux