On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 10:45 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Friday 26 January 2007 10:29, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > So, how does this list like the idea of adding a bulletpoint for > > "sane provides" to the package review guidelines ? > > I like it. However, defining 'sane provides' might prove difficult, but if > you have pointers or a draft bullet point I'd gladly read it (: Its hard to make that very precise, but it should mean something like Look at the list of provides and verify that all of them are intentional. Use repoquery to check if other packages already provide the same thing, and if so, look closer. This is generally ok if the provides is for a .so that lives outside of LIBDIR, otherwise it indicates a potential problem. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging