Le lundi 08 janvier 2007 à 12:08 -0500, Matthew Miller a écrit : > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 05:37:10PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Sorry, I meant 1.1 vs 1.09. > > Then the best practice would be to write 1.1 1.10 (I hope this is > > documented somewhere). Tought of course it would be better if upstream > > I'm not sure that's best practice at all -- version numbers should match > upstream version numbers as closely as possible. In the perl case versions are numbers so 1.1 = 1.10 Though some perl authors rejoice in skipping the last 0 to make Red Hat users suffer (speaking from painful experience) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
