Le Lun 8 janvier 2007 17:09, Axel Thimm a écrit : > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:03:54AM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote: >> Axel, 1.10 wins over 1.09. Why do you need an Epoch in this case? > > Sorry, I meant 1.1 vs 1.09. Then the best practice would be to write 1.1 1.10 (I hope this is documented somewhere). Tought of course it would be better if upstream used a fixed digit number, but some developpers have been known to take this suggestion as a pretext to rant on Red Hat in general, and rpm in particular. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
