On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:52:52AM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx (Axel Thimm) writes:
>
> > So let me ask again: What's really that bad about including the
> > current *.la files into devel by default (unless really needed in
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > main packages)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Again: it depends on the (more or less) legitimated module whether .la
> files (of listed dependency_libs) are required at runtime. Therefore,
> .la files MUST be in main (when they are packaged at all).
>
>
>
> Enrico
>
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpnQe64qVlEF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
