rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Rex Dieter) writes: >> The decision whether loading fails or succeeds depends on the module, >> not the library. > > I'd argue that any such module is thus broken by design, since it includes > undefined symbols, and should be fixed. <assuming-that-libtool-makes-sense-in-fedora> Why? It's one of libtool's features that dep-loading can be done by .la files. Why should a module be broken when it uses such a feature? </assuming-that-libtool-makes-sense-in-fedora> > I'm willing to compromise to include these bits in main (and not -devel) if > that's what it takes to gain your support/vote. Current rule (avoid .la whenever possible) is best solution. Perhaps the MUST can be weakened a little bit by allowing substantiated exceptions. Enrico -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
