Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rex Dieter (rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> AFAIK, the only unknown up to this point was kde, which I've found it is 
> fixable (runtime, at least).  I'm aware of no other cases where .la 
> files are required for runtime function.

gnucash has its own custom module system built on top of libltdl;
it is very unhappy without them. It's probably hackable to work,
but as there's already a branch on the trunk that ports it all
to gmodule, I'm not that interested in looking at it outside
of possibly backporting that branch.

Bill

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux