On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 04:29 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 23, 2007, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 1) Firmware packages are given the Group: tag of Firmware > > > 2) The License tag for any firmware that disallows modification should > > be set to: > > > "Redistributable firmware, no modification permitted" > > Any chance of getting all non-Free firmware to Require: some empty > package (say freedom-loss or proprietary-crap :-) such that: > > - one could yum erase this package and end up without any non-Free > Software installed, and > > - one could easily veirfy that custom distros with a subset of the > complete Fedora package set don't include any such proprietary > packages? The entire goal of standardizing on a specific license tag be used is that it's easy to have a simple script for query/removing/installing or whatnot and _not_ have to do magic packages like this. Maintaining such a package is always and without fail an absolute nitemare to do. Jeremy -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
