On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 06:00:40PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > After repeated (heated) discussions over init scripts, I wanted to guideify my > thoughts (and others) on this. Can we have some discussion over this draft > and vote at next meeting? > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/InitScripts > I would be more stringent than that and require packages to transit into non-%config init files. E.g. to make a temporary exception and explicitely say that this exception will be lifted later. The migration should be done in the new package's %prein script. Also a side-note: The text could be read as "all config information must be under /etc/sysconfig", maybe this needs to be clarified to mean any config bits, not already dealt with in the package's native config space under /etc? I had a couple of times where people argued that everything pertaining to configuration needs to be placed under /etc/sysconfig, so the policy could be misread by them. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpshG5JDOIWn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
