On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 14:53 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > e) True arguments are that > obscuring the buildroot for the sake of an extremely rare > corner case (several users building the same package on the > same system w/o chroots) implies fixing it for far more not > corner-cases like building i386 and x86_64 packages > simulataneously. So the `id -nu` part is far less important > than adding the target arch, but that was silently forgotten by > racor > Is your suggestion to add arch to the buildroot? -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
