Mr. Thimm, you don't seriously expect an answer to this email, which I consider to be filled with hostile and false allegations of yours. On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 14:53 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > a) the raguments were mainly between racor and myself > b) topic was decided on an IRC meeting I couldn't attend > c) The summary of my arguments were given by ... racor ??? > d) My arguments were not "I do it with macros, don't care about the rest" > => Deliberately misquoted? You could not be wronger. > e) True arguments are that > obscuring the buildroot for the sake of an extremely rare > corner case (several users building the same package on the > same system w/o chroots) implies fixing it for far more not > corner-cases like building i386 and x86_64 packages > simulataneously. So the `id -nu` part is far less important > than adding the target arch, but that was silently forgotten by > racor You should remember that this had been an IRC, and I was citing off-head. > I remember us waiting for racor to finish with his relocation for a > couple of months before dicussing topics where he was having an > active opinion and in this case it's a blitz decision in absence of > one party. I'm also not amuised by racor's misquoting, be it > deliberate or not. > > In light of the above I'd like to ask to rediscuss this. I don't have a log of this meeting, but IIRC, we concluded to revisit this topic should something appear _technically_ broken with it. Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
