Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "AT" == Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

AT> I'd prefer that over 3) because if you have a folder inotify a
AT> daemon you'd be running the updating again several times per
AT> larger rpm transaction. Unless that daemon would have a wait
AT> timeout on inotifies to collect several triggers, but then it
AT> sounds easier to do 4)

Besides, how do you then update the cache during, say, the initial
install, or if I install some packages in single-user mode?
Hopefully the installer won't have to start a pile of daemons just to
get a proper system.

I have to wonder, are the people who advocate keeping a daemon running
forever to keep things in sync over a one-line crontab the same ones
who oppose xdg-utils because it's a shell script of moderate length?
Because if so, there seems to be a significant disconnect there and
I'm having trouble figuring out what the rules are.

 - J<

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux