On Friday 22 December 2006 09:22, Rex Dieter wrote: > imo, ldconfig example isn't a good one, but I get your point. > Difference being here, messing with ldconfig can horribly break things. > A stale iconcache doesn't break anything, at worst only affects app > startup time (a little). Ah! I missed this point. If the above statement is true, I'm all for it. I had thought we were going down the road of making a rule that would leave the cache unupdated period, and Some Other Process As Of Yet Unwritten would have to clean up behind us. If this happens already, and all the end user sees is a slight delay, I'm for it. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgplKCx1KPkRH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
