On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 10:26 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > I think I've realized where I'm getting confused, though. JPackage > packages will always fall under this policy. However this policy only > allows use of the "jpp" portion of the JPackage release tag until the > technical considerations are worked out. At that point the policy will > use the integer subrelease from JPackage without jpp. > > If this is true then I'm still +1. Yes. This is the case. > I dislike using the word Exception in something that's meant to be > permanent because exceptions are things you want to get rid of. Since > this is something that we're seeing a continuous value in maybe > "JPackage Subrelease Policy" would be better. Use of the subrelease by > itself is generic enough that we might even consider extending it to > cover other situations if there's a legitimate need for it in the > future. Agreed. I'll rename it accordingly when it gets out of Draft. ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
