On Monday 12 February 2007 10:52, Joe Orton wrote: > I completely agree with that. Unless the buildroot is picked by > mkdtemp() you can't really *guarantee* avoidance of conflicts. If you > want a guarantee then rpmbuild should be fixed to ignore BuildRoot and > use mkdtemp() instead. Standardising an inadequate workaround and > having packagers go through fixing N hundred spec files to match seems > like a waste of time. +1 We have the spec stubs that have an acceptable buildroot tag for new packages, I don't see much value in harping on existing packages for the BuildRoot. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpAfwpJ4afi7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
