>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: JK> It was brought up that since RHEL is based on Fedora releases, and JK> RHEL does crazy things like support RHEL3 to RHEL5 upgrades, it is JK> reasonable to have conflicts information in a Fedora package that JK> dates a little farther back than the latest supported Fedora JK> release, since we're trying to use these packages and guidelines JK> for RHEL too. Does the upgrade case really matter, though? After all, we're talking about packages in the distro (Fedora or RHEL) and if you upgrade then you shouldn't have any in-distro packages older than what is in the distro you've just updated to. So packages needn't conflict with anything older than what's in the current distro release. Or is there some problem in ordering of upgrades here? - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
