On Tuesday 16 January 2007 14:45, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > As discussed in today's FPC meeting, I've made some changes to the > Conflicts Draft Proposal to document some acceptable cases, add some > additional valid file name conflict workarounds, and fix the wording > here and there. > > FPC Members: Please vote on this draft via email, so we can get this in > place well before the Core/Extras merge. As I wrote the draft, I vote > +1. ;) > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Conflicts It was brought up that since RHEL is based on Fedora releases, and RHEL does crazy things like support RHEL3 to RHEL5 upgrades, it is reasonable to have conflicts information in a Fedora package that dates a little farther back than the latest supported Fedora release, since we're trying to use these packages and guidelines for RHEL too. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgp1nbL4wpeGy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
