>>>>> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: JLT> I don't think that we should allow any implicit package JLT> Do we need to note under "Optional Functionality" that the JLT> Conflicts: should go away when the package being conflicted with JLT> is in the repository and the oldest possible version in a JLT> particular distro release is new enough not to conflict? This JLT> would get rid of many of the conflicts that glibc has. Umm, you know, it helps to hit reload so you're actually reading the correct version. - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
