Axel Thimm wrote :
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:45:19PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> > Ville Skyttä wrote :
> >
> > > And BTW, for what it's worth, it's /etc/init.d, not /etc/rc.d/init.d in LSB -
> > > so it might not hurt to treat /etc/init.d as the "canonical" path in Fedora
> > > wherever it is hardcoded into even though there is the symlink between the
> > > two.
> >
> > Argh! I could have sworn I had read the opposite somewhere,
>
> Me, too. Obviously not from the LSB, I wonder where we picked that up?
>
> > and have been changing my spec files ever since. Here too, we need
> > to document clearly which one we should use, even though the symlink
> > won't be removed anytime soon...
>
> Change them to use %{_initdir} and have redhat-rpm-config's maintainer
> fix it. :)
I usually don't do this, but : +1
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6
Load : 0.80 0.36 0.23
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
