On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:45:19PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Ville Skyttä wrote :
>
> > And BTW, for what it's worth, it's /etc/init.d, not /etc/rc.d/init.d in LSB -
> > so it might not hurt to treat /etc/init.d as the "canonical" path in Fedora
> > wherever it is hardcoded into even though there is the symlink between the
> > two.
>
> Argh! I could have sworn I had read the opposite somewhere,
Me, too. Obviously not from the LSB, I wonder where we picked that up?
> and have been changing my spec files ever since. Here too, we need
> to document clearly which one we should use, even though the symlink
> won't be removed anytime soon...
Change them to use %{_initdir} and have redhat-rpm-config's maintainer
fix it. :)
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpjkVaR4QzA8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
