On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:35:51PM -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> Well, I'm trying to review the core perl package, and part of that has
> been a near total spec rewrite. I need to know whether I should add a
> perl-devel or not.
If there is a mass rebuild (e.g. by Matt's buildsystem) before test2
it could be used to check whether that split really harms
anything. But I think perhaps that's us being to pedantic in this
case, and we could revisit it after F7.
But it wouldn't hurt to add a forward compatible
Provides: perl-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
That way any current package that should depend on perl-devel instead
of or in addition to perl would have a transition time to fix the BRs.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp3nF25LZWCr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
