Re: Re: Draft: Perl packages don't need -devel for .h headers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 06 February 2007 14:13, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:58:27AM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> >
> > Rather than blanket approval for the status quo, I think it would be
> > better to first discuss whether -devel packages for some perl modules
> > should be introduced instead.
>
> Does anyone know about how many perl packages we're talking about? If
> it's a small number I'd go with Ville and have them properly split out
> their *-devel.

Just for the record, I don't have a real opinion yet, so you won't know where 
you'll end up if you decide to go with me at this point :).  All I suggested 
above was discussion about it (which we now have, good).

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux