On Tuesday 06 February 2007 21:35, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > Well, I'm trying to review the core perl package, and part of that has > been a near total spec rewrite. I need to know whether I should add a > perl-devel or not. I still haven't formed an opinion, but here's some numbers from i386 FC6: $ du -hc `rpm -ql perl` | tail -n 1 237M total $ du -hc `rpm -ql perl | grep '\.h$'` | tail -n 1 1.6M total Not that significant. Also, I haven't checked but would guess that *.h don't inflict any extra dependencies. There's also a bunch of *.ph files which I gather are _mostly_ for development purposes but some modules do pull some of them in at runtime (eg. Net::Domain, Sys::Hostname) so I suppose it's safer to leave at least *.ph alone unless someone knows better. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
