On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 21:54 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:35:51PM -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > Well, I'm trying to review the core perl package, and part of that has > > been a near total spec rewrite. I need to know whether I should add a > > perl-devel or not. > > If there is a mass rebuild (e.g. by Matt's buildsystem) before test2 > it could be used to check whether that split really harms > anything. But I think perhaps that's us being to pedantic in this > case, and we could revisit it after F7. OK, being pedantic: - I can't make perl pass review unless I make a perl-devel OR - Perl needs an exception in the guidelines so it can pass review. Which one would people prefer for FC-7? At this point, I'm rather indifferent. :) ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
