Re: DesktopFiles proposal, final wording

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On 1/30/07, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As spot requested, here's an update to the wording of:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DesktopFiles
to make it clear that desktop-file-install usage is mandatory to help
ensure .desktop file safety and spec-compliance.
I think mentioning vendor-id is useless, since now fedora packaging
policies doesn't include "fedora" as vendor name .
Uh, yes it does:
"If upstream uses <vendor_id>, leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as <vendor_id>."
That part of the policy remains unchanged.

-- Rex

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux