On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:26:19AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Axel Thimm (Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > I would be more stringent than that and require packages to transit > > into non-%config init files. E.g. to make a temporary exception and > > explicitely say that this exception will be lifted later. The > > migration should be done in the new package's %prein script. > > Why would changing from %config to non-%config require > changes in the scriplets at all? The above referred to the following part of the draft: "A valid exception to this rule would be existing packages where configuration is still done via the init file. In this case, the init file could be marked as %config to preserve a users configuration upon upgrade, hopefully so that the user can migrate said configuration to a new /etc/sysconfig/<service> config file." Does it make more sense now? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp7mgsh0rcyS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
