On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 07:43:04PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > TK> I think tibbs had the opposite viewpoint but I don't remember if > TK> we got to a point where he decided it didn't matter or we came to > TK> an agreement or just let it drop. > > I guess the point is that I can't figure out what additional value it > adds, and in general it's bad to package up something that's > completely needless. egg is a packaging method that is orthogonal to what we use. Leaving the eggs around may get users to start using egg-installation and get files on the system unregistered by rpm. Or not? If the above is correct eggs should even be banned just as other non-native package formats are banned (debs or tarballs for example). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpQny9HcesVQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
