Re: Re: LibtoolArchives, v0.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rex Dieter wrote:
Enrico Scholz wrote:

rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Rex Dieter) writes:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LibtoolArchives
...
Comments?
| MUST: If .la libtool archives in $LD_LIBRARY_PATH2 cannot be excluded,
| they MUST be included in -devel (with associated .so symlink).

is wrong... it should be

| MUST: If .la libtool archives in $LD_LIBRARY_PATH cannot be excluded,
| they MUST be included in main-package but NOT in -devel.

Huh?  .la libtool archives in LD_LIBRARY_PATH are those used for *linking*,
so why not -devel?

I suppose a case could still exist where .la files are needed for runtime (though I can't think of any, now that kde is fixable), so we could reword this to leave it to the packager's discretion.

-- Rex

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux