Re: Re: Re: Wrong buildroot ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rex Dieter wrote:
> Todd Zullinger wrote:
[...]
>>If the packaging committee wanted to make a standard buildroot and
>>enforce it have the build systems set %buildroot.
>
> We looked into that.  I recall there some serious implementation
> problems with that method.

Ah, I should've guessed it wouldn't be that simple. :)

Do you (or anyone else) recall if the problems were in addition to
just causing other builders a hassle if they try to build packages
which lack a BuildRoot?  That one seems rather minor to me, especially
considering that the BuildRoot: tag doesn't have to be removed from
spec files immediately, it would just become irrelevant for review
purposes (one less nit for anyone to pick).

--
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
======================================================================
Nothing is so simple that it cannot be misunderstood.
    -- Teague's Paradox

Attachment: pgp02DNfAiGFy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux