On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 17:50 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote : > > > Joe Orton wrote: > > > > > Standardising an inadequate workaround and > > > having packagers go through fixing N hundred spec files to match seems > > > like a waste of time. > > > > *sigh*. One justification the FPC had used for mandating a standard > > buildroot was to avoid the waste of time associated with endless debates on > > mailing lists and package reviews. So much for that plan. (: > > The "standard" buildroot plan is a good plan, as long as the goal > involves ripping it out from all spec files once and for all (i.e. have > a sane default set for rpmbuild). > > I keep repeating this, sorry, but am I the only one who'd like to see > all useless and repetitive stuff taken out of spec files? > - BuildRoot > - The "-q" to %setup > - BuildRoot cleanup when %install and %clean start > - %defattr(-,root,root,-) or %defattr(-,root,root,0755) No. Accepting patches. Welcoming patches. ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
