On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:45:57AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:04:47 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > No, I don't favour "bloat"ing, you often seem to assume strange > > things about people you communicate with. > > It's just you, Axel. It's triggered by your strange replies. ;) I > try to explain the problem to you and in return only get something > like "Yes, that's what *-devel packages are about" which tells me > you are not serious. You're now getting personal, watch the line. And I do know for a fact that it's not "just me". > As much as I support upstream changes, it is beyond my motivation to > be the one to take the lead here. But it is your motivation obviously to head towards the opposite direction. > I have not even seen any solutions other than killing .la files > except where the used ltdl doesn't understand .so files. Maybe because your toolbox at home only has a hammer? How many times did I mention in this thread that there are working patches even used for quite some time in other distros? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpmuE0rYoDUH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
