Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 22:46, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ExceptionJPackage
"According to Fernando Nasser, JPackage RPMS only use integers in the Release:
field, in the format Xjpp. If this is the case, then the following format
will ensure clean upgrades from Fedora to JPackage and so forth: [...]"
JPackage's pre-release Release: tags are not Xjpp only. Was this considered
in the draft? Some random examples:
classpathx-jaxp-1.0-0.beta1.10jpp
cpptasks-1.0-0.b4.1jpp
cryptix-asn1-0.1.12-0.cvs20011119.7jpp
activemq3-3.2.5-0.r1125.2jpp
radeox-0.9-0.beta.2jpp
More at http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/jpackage/1.7/generic/free/repodata/
These are old style tags, before Nicolas brought up the possible
problems with upgrade paths. There is a guideline proposal on the list
currently, so people choose between two (Fedora-like) numbering schemes.
You've been away for too long ;-)
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
