On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 05:10 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:45 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > As discussed in today's FPC meeting, I've made some changes to the > > Conflicts Draft Proposal to document some acceptable cases, add some > > additional valid file name conflict workarounds, and fix the wording > > here and there. > > > > FPC Members: Please vote on this draft via email, so we can get this in > > place well before the Core/Extras merge. As I wrote the draft, I vote > > +1. ;) > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Conflicts > > This example is doesn't make sense: > > <cite> > * Move the man pages into different sections in each package (e.g. > man1/myapi.1.gz and man3/myapi.3.gz) > </cite> > > man1 and man3 serve different purposes[1], therefore moving man-pages > from man1 to man3 is not applicable nor advisable. > > > +1 with the sentence above removed. Good point. Sentence removed. ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
