On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:45 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > As discussed in today's FPC meeting, I've made some changes to the > Conflicts Draft Proposal to document some acceptable cases, add some > additional valid file name conflict workarounds, and fix the wording > here and there. > > FPC Members: Please vote on this draft via email, so we can get this in > place well before the Core/Extras merge. As I wrote the draft, I vote > +1. ;) > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Conflicts This example is doesn't make sense: <cite> * Move the man pages into different sections in each package (e.g. man1/myapi.1.gz and man3/myapi.3.gz) </cite> man1 and man3 serve different purposes[1], therefore moving man-pages from man1 to man3 is not applicable nor advisable. +1 with the sentence above removed. Ralf [1] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSHAREMANMANUALPAGES -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
