Re: Java (jpackage) naming scheme rehash -- part 1 Goals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 12 January 2007 11:48, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Yes, we have the changelog entries added for the respin everything
> cases, some old entries regarding changes that were made for GCJ
> compilation when it was not as perfect as it is today, some emergency
> local fixes doen during release times that were incorporated upstream a
> few days later.  If this is deemed not important we can stopp merging them.
>
> We will still add our '.N' release number to the release tag and add a
> changelog entry saying that we have imported and are rebuilding it with
> AOT.
>
> BTW, so far we had to remove the Vendor and Distribution tags from the
> upstream spec file too, but that has been removed upstream to make it
> easier for the distros to import the packages.

I think adopting a work method that doesn't stomp local changes is very 
important, including adding an entry about importing from upstream for the 
build.

I still don't like "jpp" being there, however I suppose I can live with it, 
provided others on the packaging committee can too, and we create a special 
case for it (ICK).

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgprmH0jpHGV4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux