On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 11:39:38AM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote: > 1) If this is a problem that only affects yum and all the other > depsolvers do it efficiently, would it be better to fix yum instead or > working around it by spec file changes? No, it's the other way round: yum is more efficient in downloading because it most often does not need to download everything, while the other depsolvers always download the bist in advance. It's a bit oversimplified, but that servers for a first picture. The discussion is about whether some packages force yum to go download and drop its bandwidth performance to that of the other depsolvers, but that's just 0.7% of all packages, so not really worth attacking at all IMHO. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpBXcUS5P17E.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
